Part 1 of the ‘Fast growth secrets’ series: Top secrets of tech founders revealed
Learn about what tech founders wish they’d known about IP protection and navigating the transition from start-up to scale-up.
Starting and growing a successful business is no easy feat. But it’s even harder if you’re trying to do it on your own. That’s why it’s so important to learn from the experiences of others who have been there and done it. But unfortunately, when battle-hardened founders get together to share experiences, it’s usually behind closed doors.
To create this report (the first in a series), we brought together a group of experienced SaaS, DeepTech and GreenTech founders and investors to share their top tips. In this guide, you’ll find the basics of what every founder should know about IP. And you’ll hear from fellow founders on what they wish they’d known about IP protection when they started their businesses.
What’s covered?
What founders should know about protecting their intellectual property:
- Why do businesses file patents?
- The difference between patents and trade secrets
- Why is trademarking important, even for b2b businesses?
- How to ensure ROI from IP protection
How to master the art of scaling:
- Bootstrapping vs. seeking external investment
- What to look for in an investor
- How to navigate tax relief pitfalls
Have we piqued your interest?
Download the free report today to unlock successful founders’ fast growth secrets. Or get in touch with our specialist technology law team.
Warning: Undefined array key "author_person" in /home/b4business/public_html/wp-content/themes/b4-2020/functions.php on line 121
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/b4business/public_html/wp-content/themes/b4-2020/functions.php on line 121
More in Solicitors
Freeths backs next generation of female leaders through ongoing Women of...
Leading law firm Freeths is continuing its support for the Women of the Year (WOTY) Awards 2026, as the search begins for women making a meaningful impact across business and society. Now in its 44th year, Women of the Year remains one of the UK’s longest‑standing platforms for celebrating female achievement. Freeths is once again […]
B4 welcomes the renewed membership of Jenny Harvey Immigration
Jenny Harvey Immigration is a niche immigration law firm advising Oxfordshire-based businesses and individuals, with clients spanning the globe. Jenny has lived and worked in Oxford for over forty years and has run her own firm for almost a decade. As a sole practitioner, she enjoys the flexibility her role offers—whether that’s speaking with US-based […]
The Renters’ Rights Act comes into force this Friday, 1 May...
The Renters’ Rights Act, which is designed to give residential tenants better protection, comes into force on Friday and applies to both existing and new tenancies. The new regulations do not currently apply to social housing or lodgers. The Act is being implemented in phases. The main changes on Friday will be: • All assured […]
From this author
Mills & Reeve announces sponsorship of inaugural Ox Tech Week
Mills & Reeve has announced its sponsorship of the inaugural Ox Tech Week, taking place from 26 to 29 May, supporting a landmark event that will shine a spotlight on Oxford’s world leading innovation ecosystem.
End of 2025: Business reflections from Mills & Reeve
As we wrap up 2025, it’s a good moment to pause and reflect on what’s been an eventful year for Oxfordshire and to look ahead at what’s on the horizon for 2026.
Innovation gap opening due to varying AI adoption – Mills &...
An innovation and governance gap is opening up between businesses that realise the potential of GenAI and those that see its impact as limited, our new report has found.
According to The Critical AI Window, organisations that don’t find ways to capitalise on the potential of AI to drive innovation and growth run the risk of being left behind. As a result, competitive edge is at risk.
Our report shows that less than a third of businesses (31%) are using GenAI, with only one-fifth (22%) seeing it as high value.
Paul Knight, partner at Mills & Reeve said: “There is a clear divide amongst businesses – between those that have bought into AI and are building systems and processes around it, and those that are still unsure of its impact beyond mid- to low-value tasks, such as reducing administration and improving efficiencies and productivity.
“This divide is opening up an innovation and governance gap, as early innovators seize on the opportunities that AI presents. While our research shows that the number of businesses using GenAI is likely to rise to 72% by 2027, the lag in performance between then and now could become insurmountable.”
The report highlights the biggest concerns felt by businesses over AI adoption. The majority (90%) are concerned about inaccuracy, more than eight in ten are worried about safety risks (85%), such as cyber attacks, with the impact on future employment also a cause for concern. However, despite 83% of respondents stating that are worried about regulatory compliance, only 31% of businesses have a risk mitigation strategy in place.
Paul added: “The explosion of GenAI has seen a raft of regulations introduced across the world, with more likely, and all of them subject to change as AI understanding develops. In the UK, the regulation of AI relies on existing legal frameworks such as intellectual property, data protection and contract law, highlighting the growing need for these frameworks to be adapted to address the novel risks and complexities introduced by AI technologies. All this suggests that there will be no steady state for regulation for some time.”
However, the risk of not complying is significant, both reputationally and financially. Within the EU, under the EU AI Act, for example, violations can cause administrative fines of €35 million or 7% of total global turnover, whichever is greater.
“There is a real need for businesses to set their own guardrails as legislation in the UK catches up. If they don’t fully understand the legal and ethical boundaries – whether around data protection, intellectual property, or equality law – the consequences could be profound. A single misjudgement could expose the organisation to group litigation.”