Cybersecurity and NIS 2 – what does this mean for you?
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS 2) came into force on 16 January 2023. By 17 October 2024, Member States must adopt and publicise measures to comply with the Directive. NIS 2 will apply to a broad range of businesses which provide their services, or carry out their activities in the EU even if they are not based in a Member State. So what does this mean for you?
Use our NIS flow chart to see if NIS 2 applies to you. Note that digital infrastructure is classified as a highly critical sector and digital providers come within a critical sector. This catches (amongst others) cloud computing service providers, online marketplaces, search engines, social network platforms and data centre providers.
If you think NIS 2 applies to your business, here are 5 key things you need to do.
1. Determine where your main establishment is for NIS 2 purposes
By 17 October 2024 you need to determine whether you fall into any of the following categories:
- Domain Name Systems service provider
- Top Level Domain name registry or entity providing domain name registration services
- Cloud computing service provider
- Data centre service provider
- Content delivery network provider
- Managed service provider
- Managed security service provider
- Provider of online marketplaces
- Provider of online search engines
- Provider of social networking services platforms
Businesses in these categories will fall under the jurisdiction of the Member State in which they have their main establishment in the EU. This means where decisions relating to cybersecurity risk management measures are predominantly taken. If such decisions are taken outside the EU, the main establishment shall be the Member State where cybersecurity operations are carried out. If this can’t be determined, it will be the Member State where the entity has the highest number of employees in the Union. If an entity is not established in the EU but offers services there, it will need to designate a representative who is established in one of the Member States where services are offered.
Providers of electronic communications networks and publicly available electronics communications services based outside the EU but providing services there will come under the jurisdiction of the Member State (or States) in which they provide services. Unlike the businesses above, providers of electronic communications networks and publicly available electronics communications services do not need to designate a representative in the EU. They do, however, need to comply with the requirements below.
2. Track upcoming cybersecurity risk management measures
Having worked out which Member State (or States) has jurisdiction over your business for NIS 2 purposes, you will need to track what cybersecurity risk management measures they put in place to comply with the Directive.
The measures will be adopted and published by 17 October 2024, so the detail is not yet available, however, NIS 2 takes an “all-hazards” approach that aims to protect network and information systems and the physical environment from incidents. Article 21 of NIS 2 states the measures shall include:
- Policies on risk analysis and information system security
- Incident handling
- Business continuity e.g. backup management, disaster recovery and crisis management
- Supply chain security
- Security in network and information systems acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling
- Procedures to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk management measures
- Cyber hygiene practices and cybersecurity training
- Policies on the use of cryptography and encryption
- Human resources security and access control policies
- The use of multi-factor authentication and secured communications systems
Your management body must approve your cybersecurity risk management measures, oversee their implementation, and undertake appropriate cybersecurity training. Management can be liable for infringements, so take these obligations seriously and get your cybersecurity house in order before autumn 2024.
3. Get ready to provide information to the competent authority
Member States must adopt a national cybersecurity strategy and designate or establish competent national authorities with cyber crisis management and computer security incident response teams (CSIRT). If you fall in the scope of NIS 2, you will need to provide the relevant competent authority with detailed information by 17 January 2025.
This information includes your sector, subsector and type, including whether you are in a critical sector, along with details of the Member States where you provide services. Any changes to the information will need to be reported without delay and in any event within three months of the change. Keep this on your radar for future reporting obligations and consider adding cybersecurity as a regular agenda item at management meetings to help plan compliance.
4. Be aware of future reporting requirements
When the CSIRT and competent authorities are established, you must notify them, without undue delay, of any incident having a significant impact on the provision of your services. An incident is widely defined as “any event compromising the availability, authenticity, integrity or confidentiality of stored, transmitted or processed data or of the services offered by, or accessible via, network and information systems” (Article 23(3) NIS 2).
You should also notify, without undue delay, the recipients of your services of incidents that are likely to adversely affect the provision of the service and advise them of any measures they can take in response to a significant cyber threat. Consider who will be responsible for reporting incidents in your business and update your incident response plan accordingly.
5. Note the timings for reporting incidents
The timings of the reporting obligations will be tight:
- Early warnings must be filed without undue delay and within 24 hours of becoming aware of an incident
- Incident notifications must be filed without undue delay and within 72 hours of becoming aware of an incident
- An intermediate report may be requested by the CSIRT or competent authority
- Final reports must be filed within one month of the incident notification
Factor these deadlines in to your internal reporting processes.
Is NIS 2 more stringent for businesses?
All businesses that were subject to the Cybersecurity Directive 2016/1148 (NIS 1) will also be affected by NIS 2, but the scope of NIS 2 has been widened to include a broader range of technology businesses such as social network platforms and data centre providers. Unlike its predecessor, NIS 2 requires management to approve cybersecurity risk management measures and holds them to account, via potential liability, for non-compliance.
NIS 2 also has stricter enforcement measures. Depending on the nature of the entity, penalties for non-compliance can be up to €10m or 2% of the organisation’s worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. These sanctions mean businesses should take their cybersecurity measures seriously, but this is against a backdrop of more frequent cyberattacks and ransomware demands, so management focus on cybersecurity can only help build resilience to such attacks.
What about the cost of cybersecurity measures? Under NIS 2 entities must “take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of network and information systems which those entities use for their operations, or for the provision of their services, and to prevent or minimise the impact of incidents on recipients of their services and on other services. Taking into account the state of the art and, where applicable, relevant European and international standards, as well as the cost of implementation”. This latter factor will be a relief to businesses as cost considerations were not part of NIS 1. Compliance with standards such as ISO certifications may help towards compliance with NIS 2. So businesses working towards these standards or renewing certifications may be ahead of the curve.
Ultimately NIS 2 is aimed at harmonising minimum standards of cybersecurity across the EU and ensuring cooperation between relevant national authorities. Speaking of harmonisation, the UK has announced that it will be reforming national legislation that previously transposed NIS 1 into UK law. The proposed reformations are not as wide ranging as NIS 2. So when NIS 2 comes into force, the minimum cybersecurity requirements and incident notifications will differ at UK level and under the EU rules. So organisations that come within the scope of NIS 2 will need to comply with two different cybersecurity regimes. If nothing else this demonstrates the importance of cybersecurity in the digital age and the fact that it should be high on the management agenda.
More in Solicitors
Freeths sets 2040 net zero pathway with release of first firm‑wide...
Leading law firm Freeths has just published its first Net Zero Transition Plan, marking a major step forward in the firm’s long-term commitment to responsible business. The plan sets out a clear, science-aligned pathway to achieving net zero across the value chain by 2040, underpinned by newly validated near and long-term targets from the Science […]
TalkTalk Business expands managed services portfolio with addition of Planet IT
Leading law firm Freeths has advised the selling shareholders of Planet IT on the sale of the business to TalkTalk Business, supporting TalkTalk Business’s expansion of its managed services portfolio.
Freeths Spotlight: A Young Apprentice’s Path to a Career in Law
Freeths has been working with an outstanding legal apprentice who has shared her story about carving out a successful career in law via the apprenticeship route. She’s currently part of the team at Freeths in Oxford, and her experience offers a really strong example of the opportunities apprenticeships can provide in the legal sector.
From this author
End of 2025: Business reflections from Mills & Reeve
As we wrap up 2025, it’s a good moment to pause and reflect on what’s been an eventful year for Oxfordshire and to look ahead at what’s on the horizon for 2026.
Innovation gap opening due to varying AI adoption – Mills &...
An innovation and governance gap is opening up between businesses that realise the potential of GenAI and those that see its impact as limited, our new report has found.
According to The Critical AI Window, organisations that don’t find ways to capitalise on the potential of AI to drive innovation and growth run the risk of being left behind. As a result, competitive edge is at risk.
Our report shows that less than a third of businesses (31%) are using GenAI, with only one-fifth (22%) seeing it as high value.
Paul Knight, partner at Mills & Reeve said: “There is a clear divide amongst businesses – between those that have bought into AI and are building systems and processes around it, and those that are still unsure of its impact beyond mid- to low-value tasks, such as reducing administration and improving efficiencies and productivity.
“This divide is opening up an innovation and governance gap, as early innovators seize on the opportunities that AI presents. While our research shows that the number of businesses using GenAI is likely to rise to 72% by 2027, the lag in performance between then and now could become insurmountable.”
The report highlights the biggest concerns felt by businesses over AI adoption. The majority (90%) are concerned about inaccuracy, more than eight in ten are worried about safety risks (85%), such as cyber attacks, with the impact on future employment also a cause for concern. However, despite 83% of respondents stating that are worried about regulatory compliance, only 31% of businesses have a risk mitigation strategy in place.
Paul added: “The explosion of GenAI has seen a raft of regulations introduced across the world, with more likely, and all of them subject to change as AI understanding develops. In the UK, the regulation of AI relies on existing legal frameworks such as intellectual property, data protection and contract law, highlighting the growing need for these frameworks to be adapted to address the novel risks and complexities introduced by AI technologies. All this suggests that there will be no steady state for regulation for some time.”
However, the risk of not complying is significant, both reputationally and financially. Within the EU, under the EU AI Act, for example, violations can cause administrative fines of €35 million or 7% of total global turnover, whichever is greater.
“There is a real need for businesses to set their own guardrails as legislation in the UK catches up. If they don’t fully understand the legal and ethical boundaries – whether around data protection, intellectual property, or equality law – the consequences could be profound. A single misjudgement could expose the organisation to group litigation.”
Mills & Reeve announces record turnover of £181m as new head...
Leading UK law firm Mills & Reeve has announced turnover growth of £13 million over the 2024/25 financial year, resulting in a new high annual turnover of £181 million. Its Oxford office has seen standout success, with 55% fee growth and a new head of office appointed to lead its next chapter.


